“Blessed are you who believed that what was
spoken to you by the Lord would be fulfilled”
(Lk 1:45).
A friend of mine recently left the priesthood. He loved
being a priest and was a good one. His problem? He was a
man who worked with hands and fashioned beautiful things
out of wood. At a point, rightly or wrongly, he felt
that he couldn’t be really creative if he remained
celibate: “I can’t be creative without
sex!” is how he put it. That was more than
hormones speaking. He was an artist, with an
artist’s temperament. Most artists, I suspect,
will understand exactly what he is saying, even if they
don’t necessarily agree that this necessitates his
particular decision.
There’s a creativity that is released by sex, just
as there’s a sterility
(“dried-upness”) that can come about by its
suppression. Artists know this, too well in fact.
It’s one of the reasons they’re so prone to
artistic license in this area. Countless artists have
expressed this, creativity and sexuality are linked at
the very source of things.
Anne Michaels, for example, in her recent book,
Fugitive Pieces, makes a virtual spirituality
of creativity out of sex. Her two main characters, both
male, have their personalities and creativity opened up
only through sex. The intimation of course is that this
is true for everyone. This is not a simplistic thesis.
Artistic license in the area of sex is fired by more
than hormones, ego, or irresponsibility, though one
would have to be blind to not see that these often too
play a role. What drives artists here is the connection
between sex and creativity. There is a powerful link.
And why shouldn’t there be? All life is after all
created through sex, in some fashion or other of that
word.
Given this background, we see that Mary’s question
to the Angel, Gabriel, at the time of the Annunciation,
is more than a simple query in biology: “How can
this be since I am a virgin?” She had just been
told that she was to be the most creative of all
artisans, the artist of artists, the mother of the
fountain of creativity itself. So her question is a good
one, a deep one: “From what source can this life
spring, given the limited way that I am living out my
sexuality?”
This is indeed the real meditation for celibates like
myself: “How can I be creative without sex?”
It is also just as crucial a meditation for everyone
else, even for those who do enjoy healthy sexual lives.
Given our congenital propensity for polymorphous
embrace, we still all have to live out a certain sexual
asceticism. Ultimately everyone has Mary’s
question: “How can I truly bring forth new life,
given that I can’t sleep with the whole
world?”
There’s no easy answer to that question - for
artists, for married people, for celibates, or for
anyone else. Sometimes, in terms of Christian
spirituality, we have been too simplistic in our answer.
We’re paying the price for that. Too prevalent is
the artist who finds our theology of sexuality stifling
and anti-life and has walked away from the church (and
sometimes the faith) for just that reason. What is the
answer? How can any of us be creative, given that we may
not give ourselves irresponsible license in the area of
sex?
I’m not sure that there is a theoretical answer,
some clear spiritual formula that can be articulated,
canonized, and then applied in each case. We have, of
course, a few non-negotiable principles, like the ten
commandments, but these only define the outside
parameters. Inside, innate within the very concepts of
love, sex, respect, and responsibility themselves, lies
a deeper set of moral principles that are much less easy
to name and codify. We learn these more by living
morally than by studying anything. So how should we live
so that our sexuality properly fuels our creativity?
The answer to that, I suspect, will involve three
things: a certain grieving, a certain mysticism, and a
certain trust.
Grieving: We can’t be God, neither in our talents
to create nor in our capacity to sleep with the
universe. At a certain point, we have to accept limit.
We’re creatures, not God. And what we can’t
have, must be grieved or it will make us bitter.
Mysticism: Sex is earthy, real, and produces life. But
there are other, real, forms of love-making. These too
produce life. The Body of Christ is, at one and the same
time, radically physical and radically mystical. Even as
sex plays such a life-producing role in this world,
there are deep, invisible embraces inside the body of
Christ where seed and womb too meet and produce life in
ways beyond what we can phenomenologically trace.
Trust: Maybe, as we see in Mary’s response, the
real answer is trust, faith that if we live out our
lives according to what we deeply believe, no matter how
far from human fertility that may seem at times, God
will make us creative in ways that we cannot now
imagine. The Holy Spirit too makes us pregnant.
|